Page 1 of 1

doesn´t work

Posted: 02.12.2008, 14:31
by rolivastro
I make the download from svn with command

svn co svn://zeos.firmos.at/zeos/branches/testing

The files come but i can´t compile and install the component in Delphi 2009, the error is about [DCC Error] ZDbcCache.pas(248): E2003 Undeclared identifier: 'SRowBufferWidthExceeded'

and many others relative [DCC Error] ZDbcCache.pas(616): E2010 Incompatible types: 'AnsiChar' and 'Char'

Am I make anything wrong ?

Re: doesn´t work

Posted: 02.12.2008, 14:47
by gto
rolivastro wrote:I make the download from svn with command

svn co svn://zeos.firmos.at/zeos/branches/testing

The files come but i can´t compile and install the component in Delphi 2009, the error is about [DCC Error] ZDbcCache.pas(248): E2003 Undeclared identifier: 'SRowBufferWidthExceeded'

and many others relative [DCC Error] ZDbcCache.pas(616): E2010 Incompatible types: 'AnsiChar' and 'Char'

Am I make anything wrong ?
Hello rolivastro!

For the errors you pointed out, I can say they're probably caused by an old Zeos installation on the Path. Can you try to remove all older packages (or they folders from path) ?

The first error may be caused by a language issue. You changed the language in Zeos.inc file? The SRowBufferWidthExceeded constante is on the ZMessages.pas file, which is in uses list of ZDbcCache.pas. It should be visible (while using english language), but maybe in other it could not be done yet.

Posted: 03.12.2008, 07:10
by Galdarius
rolivastro[/b], do like me, install a new Windows just to test it.

Posted: 03.12.2008, 14:05
by mdaems
Hi,

I splitted your post from the announcement thread.

Concerning gto's answer : I guess he's right.
But I have a remark about the language issue : I suppose it's not the language setting but an old zeoslib version in the other compiler that's being accessed where that constant wasn't defined yet.

Mark

Posted: 03.12.2008, 15:21
by gto
mdaems wrote:I suppose it's not the language setting but an old zeoslib version in the other compiler that's being accessed where that constant wasn't defined yet.
Good point ! :)

I've not thinked about that, too.