Ben, swierzbicki is trying to install the SVN version.
swierzbicki, Unfortunately, it's not done yet. Would it be difficult to do so? I'm totally unexperienced in this. Would this involve more than just changing the packages directory?
My (stupid) proposal : why don't you do it for the two versions you use?
I propose to use following suffixes _D5->_D10, _K2,_K3,_L.
Other people : if you want to do one, just mention here and send an SVN Testing branch patch. Maybe I'll do one after I receive some working example, I can analyse.
Opposers, please tell us why you don't want this. I'll wait a week to apply the patches. This gives volunteers also some time to think about it.
mdaems : There is no stupid proposal, only stupid answers
Your proposal makes sense. It will be better to rename "each" packages as you asked for. Using the libsuffix trick will not solves the problem (dcp files will still be created with the suffix).
It will also be good to re-arrange all folder structure.
Something like :
Read the other thread but can't understand what they're talking about. Not their fault. I just don't know much about packages, installing components and all this.
Can you two put your heads together to figure out the solution, eg for two Delphi versions? Then we can see how to implement it for the others as well.
Is the re-arrange really necessary for that? I'd think we have almost the same now with the packages\build subdirectories, or not? I propose to keep it with modifying the package files if possible. Just because throwing everthing around would really slow down development even more. It would require a discussion with most other developers as well.
You can find a reasonably recent version at http://users.telenet.be/mdaems. I packaged it some weeks ago hoping the project leaders would publish it.
I should look at home what's wrong with the SVN address.
