Zeoslib Portal

Hi Mark, I understand. Will send you my diff's. I would like to test against mySQL while I am doing this, so could you point me in the right direction so I can use the test suite to at least validate that much before pushing the change to you. My selfish reason being that I want this to work on mySQ...

Any thoughts on my post above gto's? I would like to join the dev team but have heard nothing. :-)

Hi, I'm sorry, but I do NOT see the benefit of adding separate string types in solving this 557 case. I think you would have always needed SizeOf unless you also used AnsiString in D2009 in that place. But I may be wrong, of course. I'm not a Delphi specialist at all. If you are, you're very welcom...

Hi Mark, With the merge of testing back to trunk are you planning to create TZ..... string types so that you have better control over what kind of string is really in use? This for instance would have taken care of things that were highlighted in the 557 change viz: 333 - Result := SizeOf(Char)*Colu...

Hi Mark, Nice one!! Looks like the 557 change did the trick as I see no issues in my simple test harness and my application seems to be behaving itself after doing some initial testing. However.... :-) FastMM did throw up some memory leaks. This was from a simple connection no data modification and ...

There is no need to change the file name. Make sure that the "Lib Suffix" is set to "120" (no quotes) as this is what actually produces the ZDBC120.bpl

So to prove my theory I did as I described above in terms of the string replacements and then added the following to ZCompatibility: {$IFDEF VER200} TZChar_Ansi = AnsiChar; TZString_Ansi = AnsiString; TZString_Unicode = string; TZString_WideString = WideString; {$ELSE} TZChar_Ansi = Char; TZString_A...

G'Day, I find myself in the position of desperately needing Delphi 2009 support (without UNICODE) and as the 7.x is still ALPHA and as far as I can see still fundamentally broken (Notwithstanding Mark's quick responses to my problem of CHAR() and VARCHAR() fields getting chopped). I was wondering wh...

Hi Mark,

I don't believe this issue was there before. See my ZeosBug.zip attachment from a few posts back. That has all you requested in this post.

Let me know if you need anything else and I will provide it no worries.

--Donovan

Hi Mark, Removing the '- 1' you showed fixed the bug. SVN rev. 555 I am using rev 556 and your fix appears to have fixed what I reported but.... there does appear to be some pointers that are pointing off into hyperspace - see attached screen shot. This is with the same test application and sample d...

Mark, Everything is correct until we ultimately get to: procedure TZRowAccessor.SetUnicodeString(ColumnIndex: Integer; Value: WideString); begin {$IFNDEF DISABLE_CHECKING} CheckColumnConvertion(ColumnIndex, stString); {$ENDIF} case FColumnTypes[ColumnIndex - 1] of stUnicodeString{$IFDEF DELPHI12_UP}...

Hi Mark, - I have yet to trace into and see if I can debug the issue locally, but I have gathered some more information for you: - what dll are you using? It appeared that I had some old version of libmysql.dll in System32 so to be on the safe side I used the mysql51.dll from the lib folder. No diff...

Hi Mark, Thanks for the quick reply. I added logging as you suggested and received the following: 2008-12-23 22:21:09 cat: Execute, proto: mysql-5, msg: SET SESSION TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ COMMITTED 2008-12-23 22:21:10 cat: Execute, proto: mysql-5, msg: SELECT * FROM tblClients 2008-12-23 2...

G'Day, - I snapshotted the latest from SVN repo and built and successfully installed into my Delphi 2009 Architect Upd1 installation. - Connecting to an existing MySQL (Version : 5.1.22-rc) database I did a SELECT * on my table and displayed this in a DevExpress CX grid. Some of the fields have thei...

As I am looking to convert a number of Paradox based applications to a combination of mySQL, SQLite and SQLServer I was wondering if there was a Paradox DBC so that I could take the intermediary step of converting to ZEOS with Paradox and then do the new DBMS instead of doing it all in one step? I w...