Search found 95 matches
- 26.02.2013, 09:56
- Forum: ZeosLib 7.0 Stable Forum
- Topic: FPC 2.6.2 released
- Replies: 3
- Views: 712
FPC 2.6.2 released
FPC has released 2.6.2 and the "FIXES" (stable) branch has been reversioned to 2.6.3. If there are problems with ifdef and versioning please reply in this thread (mentioning the branch) and I'll have a look. I assume Lazarus snapshots will migrate to 2.6.2 quickly, and within a month of tw...
- 26.02.2013, 09:52
- Forum: ADO
- Topic: Lazarus, Zeos and Ms Access (mdb)
- Replies: 24
- Views: 19157
- 15.12.2012, 21:34
- Forum: ZeosLib 7.0 Beta Forum
- Topic: [patch_done] TimeStamp patch
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2366
- 12.12.2012, 19:59
- Forum: ZeosLib 7.0 Beta Forum
- Topic: [patch_done] TimeStamp patch
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2366
Paralel reports in sqldb:
pgsql: http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=19567
ib/FB: http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=17199 and http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=21995
pgsql: http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=19567
ib/FB: http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=17199 and http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=21995
- 08.12.2012, 22:44
- Forum: 6.6 - stable
- Topic: [solved] LinuxMint Zeos Lib Errors
- Replies: 2
- Views: 883
- 18.10.2012, 18:31
- Forum: ZeosLib 7.0 Beta Forum
- Topic: FireMonkey support?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2190
IMHO such polls are useless. Either somebody is available to do the work, or not. The vote can be 200 to 1, but if nobody is willing to do the work... Also, I would do it as a separate codebase, since the databinding in Firemonkey is also different. VCL and Firemonkey are separated codebases for a r...
- 26.09.2012, 21:14
- Forum: ZeosLib 7.0 Beta Forum
- Topic: [patch_done] Conditional compiles for Zeos 6 and 7
- Replies: 11
- Views: 2538
marcov , thank's Marco. So there is no way around to have an include file for this case. Indeed, so something like the following won't work: Then you can check the values by: {$IF defined(ZEOS_MAJOR_VERSION)} {$IF ZEOS_MAJOR_VERSION = 7} ... {$IFEND} {$ELSE} -> older then 7 {$IFEND} He or me will p...
- 23.09.2012, 14:07
- Forum: ZeosLib 7.0 Beta Forum
- Topic: [patch_done] Conditional compiles for Zeos 6 and 7
- Replies: 11
- Views: 2538
- 20.09.2012, 12:19
- Forum: ZeosLib 7.0 Beta Forum
- Topic: version check of Freepascal
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1054
I'm totally against this. The principle of the current codebase (after my mods) is that compiler versions should never be used directly in the code. The new branches should reflect this already for the more core units. (HAVE_XX and WITH_x instead of ver<x>) The usage with compiler and version checki...
- 08.06.2012, 20:03
- Forum: ZeosLib 7.0 Beta Forum
- Topic: [patch_done] Not compile zeos rev 1364 Linux
- Replies: 2
- Views: 498
- 29.05.2012, 20:48
- Forum: ZeosLib 7.0 Beta Forum
- Topic: [patch_done] Need libmysqlclient.so.18 for mysql5.5 linux
- Replies: 15
- Views: 3328
you're right here. First, I was just trying to explain what happens on *nix. Second, there is no right or wrong way. But any way where you have to explain users several times a day where to fill in what is not optimal. But the reason for the LibrayLocation 'em selves was another one. Example: We've...
- 29.05.2012, 19:33
- Forum: 6.6 - stable
- Topic: Lazarus v0.9.30.4 + ZEOSDBO-6.6.6-stable not work
- Replies: 13
- Views: 2386
ifdef cpu64 (all 64-bit CPUs) or ifdef x86_64, but I'm not aware of a specific 64-bit issues. Afaik there is no tbookmark issue, 2.6.0 and 2.6.2 will be mostly as 2.4.x, and 2.7.x will be like D2009+ which you already support, but nobody can complain that stable zeos doesn't work with unstable FPC. ...
- 16.05.2012, 19:41
- Forum: 6.6 - stable
- Topic: Lazarus v0.9.30.4 + ZEOSDBO-6.6.6-stable not work
- Replies: 13
- Views: 2386
- 15.05.2012, 13:56
- Forum: 6.6 - stable
- Topic: Lazarus v0.9.30.4 + ZEOSDBO-6.6.6-stable not work
- Replies: 13
- Views: 2386
Note that this continues to pop up regularly in Lazarus forums and maillists. Is there a chance to respin 6.6.6 with all FPC specific ifdefs removed from that file (they shouldn't be necessary anymore for at least 3 releases).? The problem is in Zeos in that it has outdated own definitions of aggreg...
- 15.05.2012, 13:49
- Forum: ZeosLib 7.0 Beta Forum
- Topic: Error installing on Lazarus 1.1
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1515
Realy strange, Marco. The Bookmark handling is exacly the same, which you have introduced in \testing. No differences. Other peoples have the same trouble with the 2.x.1 releases and \trunk or \testing. Please keep your versioning straight. 2.6.1 and 2.7.1 are _totally_ different things (with 1376 ...